Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: cashel Date: Aug 2, 2004 11:51am
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Glenn is a malicious boy, let's drive him out

SPUZZ ..just quoting a few of GLEN,s words "You might view this film again and point out what part of this film you might find obscentity" This Glen with MALICE and it is a LIE to suggest that I found obscenity in that film . I only said that it was boring cheap and stupid and made no moral judgement revision spelling

This post was modified by cashel on 2004-08-02 18:51:17

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: ridetheory Date: Aug 2, 2004 3:20pm
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Glenn is a malicious boy, let's drive him out

Okay, you never said that the film is obscene.

But if you don't think it's obscene, why do you want to prevent children from accessing it?

If you also believe, as you said in earlier posts, that a 9-year-old would find it boring, then why are you concerned with setting up a system to keep him from watching it?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: summerseve Date: Aug 2, 2004 9:19pm
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Glenn is a malicious boy, let's drive him out

SPUZZ ..just quoting a few of GLEN,s words "You might view this film again and point out what part of this film you might find obscentity" This Glen with MALICE and it is a LIE to suggest that I found obscenity in that film . I only said that it was boring cheap and stupid and made no moral judgement revision spelling

Cashel, please refer back to the title if your post, which labels the film "mind-less smut".
Arguing with you is so easy it's almost unfair.

And Glenn, please ignore the resident troll. Your posts have been interesting and intelligent, and we could certainly use more of that (as you can see)...

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cashel Date: Aug 2, 2004 9:49pm
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Glenn is a malicious boy, let's drive him out

trafalgar .. your reply is incomprehinsable and your insult is typical of your abiding dislike of me. Icertainly dislike your opinions and have openly stated this on many occassions revision )spelling but have left some to amuse

This post was modified by cashel on 2004-08-03 04:42:00

This post was modified by cashel on 2004-08-03 04:49:51

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: summerseve Date: Aug 3, 2004 11:40am
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Glenn is a malicious boy, let's drive him out

Sorry, my "if" should have read "of".
Anyway, the point has already been made: Jack called the film smut. Some people disagree. No big deal.
And really I swear, Jack, I bear you no malice. Sometimes I don't think you're for real...but malice? No.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: ridetheory Date: Aug 2, 2004 11:59pm
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Contradictions

Cashel,

Trafalgar's post was not incoherent, it was quite succinct and logical.

You called the film smut in your header of your original post. Do you consider smut to be obscene? If not, what is your definition of smut? The OED says smut is "Indecent or obscene language," and dictionary.com says that it is "Obscenity in speech or writing; Pornography." Smut is obscenity, and you called the film smut. Therefore, based on the definition, you called the film obscene.